Leaf of the Day: Heliconia Episcopalis and the Aristolochia, again

Tuesday. Just when I need all my faculties to be at their best for some fine work the lens falls out of my good glasses…sods law. It’s not the end of the world as I have many pairs of cheap reading glasses but it’s just one of those things that you don’t need. However, onwards and upwards. I went down to Leu for some rather myopic flower searching and I have painted two flower heads, the Heliconia episcopalis and the almost cute aristolochia. (I made sure this one didn’t bring along quite so many flies.) This is my second attempt at the aristolochia and of course the frustrating thing is that some parts of this one are better than the previous one and some are worse, but as I am running out of time this has to be it.
I enjoyed the heliconia as I like strong simple structural shapes. It is a brilliant orange yellow, and mere paint just cannot imitate the strength or vibrancy of the colour. It shows the remains of the spent flower head and one new flower emerging from the bracts. It is called the “episcopalis” due to the shape resembling the episcopal mitre.
From Wiki here is another of these diagrams that I like so much… of the evolution of the mitre… something I have never turned my mind to before.

There is also a shell with the same name .. the little Episcopal Mitre shell

Image from Beachcomber shell site here

Shells are so beautiful and so paintable aren’t they? . I am hoping to find some interesting ones when we finally get down to the Keys. Here is a whole other branch of natural history painting which I will have to try. When, I wonder.

Heliconia Episcopalis and Aristolochia Fimbriata

Leaf of the Day : An Incredible Edible and an Aristolochia with Eyelashes

Another exciting discovery from earlier this week was a cone from the Monstera deliciosa that literally fell at my feet. It landed on soft ground just by the path and presented too good an opportunity to miss so I took it home. The Monstera is of course the huge Swiss Cheese Plant that scales the oaks trees here and outgrows its pots in UK living rooms.
Having seen how it likes to roam about in its natural environment here in Florida, clambering up the tree trunks and throwing out its ariel roots, I feel sorry for the potbound housebound ones. There are many of them down at the gardens and I have admired the big handsome split leaves, longing to get a huge canvas out and paint one, but only in the last week did I notice first the flowers, and now the incredible edible cones.

Here is a terrestrial part of a huge monstera which climbs high up into the canopy.. making flowers and cones as it goes. It is as well, in such jungly places, to watch out for things falling on your head as much as attacking you from the ground! You can see the flower, just finishing, and the cones developing.

I left the cone on the nature table as usual and within a day it had started to ‘unwrap’ a layer of scales, starting from the bottom, revealing another layer of soft seeds inside and was also beginning to smell quite “deliciosa”. After some research I found that this is another (with caution) edible plant, and not only that but it was introduced to England in 1752 both as an ornamental and a food plant. I would like to find an 18th century recipe.

It only took a couple more days for it to unwrap its outer layer almost completely and for the pineapple/ banana scent to make it irresistibly tempting … So I tried it and it is delicious. Why is it not a commercially available fruit? Well I think there are two main problems. Firstly, it is poisonous when unripe, another fruit which contains oxalic acid crystals and so can cause severe throat swelling unless fully ripe, and secondly the creamy white soft kernals are covered with little brown specs which does make it look unappetising. Anyway here are some photos of this Delicious Monster .. what do you think?

Hmmm those black bits are not very attractive are they?
There is a lot more to say about the wonderful Monsteras but I will save all that for the day I get the big canvas.

From huge to tiny, but still a bit monstrous, today I made a sketch, then a study in colour of the little Aristolochia fimbriata.. it is small, very small. I realise that I really do need both some new glasses and some finer brushes if I am to have a hope of painting this kind of detail to the standard that I require, let alone that of the course, so I have to regard this as a dummy run. It is less than an inch and a half high.. and for me that is tiny. Unlike the other Dutchman’s pipes this little thing is slightly more winsome ..with, as Pedro so charmingly put it, eyelashes. But ,having had it sitting on my desk for a day, I am not sure about its unblinking cyclops stare..and there are things living in it too…


Aristolochia Fimbriata

Leaf of the Day: Another Aristolochia

I did want to have one more try with this plant. This is another variety which grows at Leu on one of the creeper trellis. To me this is not quite so repellent but I still feel ambivalent about it. This variety is Aristolochia cymbifera.It is probably 10 inches in length and it still retains the fleshy feel but is more spectacularly striped and spotted with its flounced frill of petal and strange horn. All this to entice flies.
Here also are two diagrams that explain a little bit more about the structures of the various flowers.

I am trying to redress the balance somewhat though, as these strange plants do attract beautiful butterflies in their droves. One of the aristolochia that grows in the Butterfly Garden at Leu is reugularly attended by many fluttering beauties. I have seen mostly monarch butterflies and swallowtails and a little creeping aristolochia growing near the Vegetable Garden has been almost eaten away by what I think are pipevine swallowtail caterpillars.

On 11th June it looked like this…

on the 16th June it looked like this …

Having been eaten by these …

If I am right , there will be some of these flying about soon..

The beautiful pipe vine swallowtail butterfly Battus philenor .

This image from Carolinanature.com here

But, it seems we can’t quite escape the dark side of these flowers completely, as, in a rather sinister twist, when the caterpillars eat the vines they ingest some of the poisons, which are so deadly to us, and they in turn become toxic to their prey. In another instance, one dangerous species of this vine is proving poisonous to the swallowtail caterpillars, it’s Russian roulette with this one.

The sketch I made today was to understand the patterns and shapes, I might return to this flower to make a more finished painting or drawing as I do like the patterns and the challenge of the soft and hard shapes. It’s still a bit of a monster though isnt it?


Aristolochia Cymbifera

Leaf of the Day: Birthwort and the Doctrine of Signatures

“Though sin and Satan have plunged mankind into an ocean of infirmities, yet the mercy of God, which is over all His workes, maketh grasse to growe upon the mountains and herbes for the use of men, and hath not only stamped upon them a distinct forme, but also given them particular signatures, whereby a man may read even in legible characters the use of them.”
William Coles
Art of Simpling (1656)

In medieval times the practice of medicine was a chaotic mixture of folklore, magic superstition, the remnants of classical texts and of course trial and error. You have then, to have some sympathy for the reasoning behind the advent of the Doctrine of Signatures. The Church constantly needing to assert its authority and combat pagan practices taught that everything on earth was put there for man’s use by God and each was therefore marked with a ‘sign’ which could be read and interpreted and used for man’s benefit.

Plants had long been used for cures of course, and sometimes based on similar notions of colour and appearance being linking to remedy, but to make for a more systematic Christian approach it was propounded that the key to the medicinal use of plants had been revealed by God in their shape and colour. Fertile imagination rather than careful experimentation was employed to link similarities between bodily parts, plants and cures.

The artist Della Porta, a believer in Signatures, published several examples in his Phytognomonica in 1591. In this case, the aconite , whose roots were thought to resemble scorpions, was used to heal the sting.
Even now some strange and completely erroneous attributes are given to certain herbal remedies based on some of these old ideas. Eye bright for example is still used today for eye complaints because the flower looks something like an eye???.. although there is no evidence that it has any real benefit.
In February 1864 Charles Dickens in his “All the year round, A Weekly Journal” comments on of Plant Signatures that “Not only the passions and superstitions but the pious delusions and migrations of our forefather’s are to be found recorded in the popular names of plants”

Some examples:
Lung wort, due to the spots on its leaves was related to pulmonary complaints. Plants with yellow flowers or roots, such as Goldenrod were believed to cure conditions of jaundice by the signature of colour. Celandine became known as pilewort because of its knobbly roots system.
Iris petals were commonly used as a poultice for bruising because the colour of the petals resemble the bruise they were to alleviate and walnuts were used for mental complaints because of the resemblance to the brain and so on and so on…
The most well know is probably the mandrake root wreathed in magic and superstition because the root resembles (to some extent) an entire human body. A typical root is branched into what that could be interpreted as arms or legs, and it may even have lumps and bumps that can be interpreted as a head or a penis so it was regarded as a potent cure-all for many human ailments.

These theories were given credence and reinforced in writings of several high profile medical practitioners in the 16th and 17th centuries, Theophrastus Bombast von Hohenheim (1493–1541), (better known as Paracelsus), Jacob Boehme, in his book “Signatura Rerum; The Signature of all Things” 1612 and the herbalist William Cole in his “Art of Simpling”.
Cole advocates the use of distilled water of hawthorn for thorn splinters and puncture wounds. “It is found by good experience, that if cloathes and spunges be wet in the said water and applied to any place where into thornes, splinters etc. have entered and be there abiding, it will notably draw forth, so that the thorn gives a medicine for its own prickling.”

I am sure many of these associations were harmless or, as with many herbal remedies even accidently beneficial and if the power of suggestion worked to cure people, all well and good, but the danger of preparing a medicine derived from a plant that may bear some similarity to the part of the body to be treated is only too apparent in the use of Birthwort on pregnant women.
Because of its strange appearance members of the aristolochia family were thought to resemble the birth canal and so preparations were made to assist the already hazardous business of childbirth with some terrible results.

Aristolochia longa Birthwort.

John Gerard in The Herbal (1633) wrote, “Birthwoort is…good for women newly brought abed, or delivered with childe. It expelleth whatever is left after the childe is delivered, also dead children.”

Midwives used this plant to aid in the expulsion of the placenta and ‘help’ the mother recover from childbirth. Unfortunately birthworts are highly toxic containing aristolochic acid, which causes severe vomiting, cramps, and muscle spasms. It is now a well know nephrotoxin, causing sever kidney damage, cancers and death, so this herb administered with the very best of intentions was more likely aborting babies and killing the mothers than helping in any way at all.
As late as the 1800s, the old idea held and women continued to receive this ‘medication’. William Cook in The Physiomedical Dispensatory (1869) wrote of the birthwort, “The cold infusion will usually act with vigor upon the kidneys….But it very especially influences the uterus.”

This is grim stuff and even when it began to dawn on people that the cure was actually killing its patient, to question the benefits of these God given qualities was unthinkable. However, like Dickens before, a Mr. A. B. Arnold writing in the report from the Medical and Chirurgical Faculty of the State of Maryland in 1844 is somewhat scathing about clinging onto traditional beliefs in the face of evidence and scientific study.
To those who objected that experience had proven these plants and animals not to have the virtues attributed to them, the advocates of the Doctrine of Signatures replied that to deny it was to call God a liar—a mode of argument not yet entirely given up by those who would have us read the book of nature through the spectacles of some preconception rather than by patient unbiased and reverential observations and experiment.”
It worries me that there are still many internet sites and crackpot practitioners who advocate the use of some of these theories.
I am all for natural remedies but based on some of those ” reverential observations and experiment ” please.
But I had to laugh when I saw this on a site promoting the multi million pound Bach flower remedy nonsense.

“Among other uses, Banana flower essence helps men to be more comfortable with their maleness.”What exactly do you do with it I wonder?

Leaf of the Day: Aristolochia Baby

After yesterdays funny and rascally squirrels I need to turn my attention to something that has been lying dormant in the fridge for a few days now, isolated in the bottom drawer and out of harms way. Something that definitely doesn’t score so highly on the cute and cuddly scale. I am not going to write too much about this plant today as I may make some more studies, if not of this one, then of another variety. Suffice it to say the drawing is of an almost cute, baby monster which is destined to grow into something almost unspeakably fascinatingly, horrible or perhaps beautiful, it all depends on your personal definition of beauty.
When I first saw one of these at Leu, a variety in fact which has an even larger, floppier flower part, I thought a terrible incident of disemboweling had taken place, some bird of prey perhaps had impaled the intestines of something very big on the fence, leaving them trailing down the trellis half hidden in the leaves of a vine. But ..phew …it was only an aristolochia.

You know how I like the odd and quirky things in life. I find huge fascination in the many strange and wonderful aspects of plant life, but while I am in awe of this creature, I am really struggling to like this or for that matter, several other members of the bizarre Aristolochia family. If they or one of their relations moved in next door you would be seriously worried.
This innocent baby I have drawn is a young Aristolochia grandiflora and will become one of these…..

The Aristolochia grandiflora – Pelican flower, Dutchman’s pipe vine, birthwort or in an attempt to try and prettify it “calico flower” The tiny one I drew was just over 1 inch in length. The one immediately above, from the top of the “pipe” to the bottom of its twisty snaky tail, is 21 inches and not yet fully grown.

Opinion on the gardening sites is mostly favourable, some regard it as an excellent conversation piece for the garden. Personally I can think of ten million more pleasant things to talk about than a plant that looks like some gruesome botanical Frankenstein’s monster, fashioned by nature to mimic intimate internal human organs. It conjures up unspeakable adjectives, ‘flaccid’, ‘visceral’, ‘intestinal’, and nouns like ‘orifice’ and ‘entrails’. It feels strange too, the “pipe” parts are very rigid, reinforced by these raised veins and the patterned flower parts feel much softer, yes, like skin. The colouring is livid in parts and fleshy pinky, creamy white in others again with those raised dark red veins protruding …and is that greeny tint just a hint of putrefaction? If this thing suddenly started to pulse you wouldn’t be surprised. At least Mother Nature spared it from being either sticky or slimy .

There is no getting away from it, this plant is just fleshy and to call it a calico plant is, I think, somewhat euphemistic. Like the dreadful smelling Carrion Cactus (which I wrote about before here ) the “petal ” pattern has more of a similarity to a nice piece of marbled liver or meat rather than a cheery piece of cotton dress fabric. This flower also has a strong unpleasant smell which attracts insects who are lured down these sinister looking tubes to the inner part of the perianth (a fused calyx and corolla) which is covered with hairs, acting as a fly-trap. Mercifully this plant does not ingest its prey as the hairs in fact wither, releasing the pollen covered flies to go about their pollination duty much to their great relief I would imagine.
The names, pipe vine and Dutchman’s pipe, no doubt another attempt to ameliorate the instinctive feeling of revulsion to this plant’s appearance, are of course an allusion to those quaint old-fashioned meerschaum pipes.

But it is with the “Birthwort” name, that this plant and I really part company and we are back to the terrifying Doctrine of Signatures.. more of this tomorrow and it’s not for the pregnant or fainthearted.


Aristolochia Baby